Friday, March 14, 2008

Street Race Kills Taxi Driver

A taxi driver was killed in Toronto, Ontario when his taxi was hit by one of two Mercedes Benzs allegedly street racing in January 2006. Tahir Khan was a Pakistani immigrant, and was three days from obtaining Canadian citizenship when he died.

Khan was killed almost instantly when he was hit by the Mercedes Benz, which then slammed his taxi into a light pole at a busy Toronto intersection. Though investigators are still trying to determine at what speed Khan's taxi was hit, it is estimated that the two cars hit speeds as fast as 140 kilometers (78 miles) an hour during the race.

The drivers of the Mercedes are both 20 years old. They pleaded guilty, and were sentenced to a year of house arrest and two years probation for the accident. The prosecution in the case was pushing for a three year prison sentence for each, and is appealing to make this a possibility.

Lawsuit

Khan's family filed a $2 million lawsuit claiming loss of care and companionship, economic losses, and punitive damages. The Khan family's lawyer, Russ Howe, says that Khan's wife and mother, who are still in Pakistan, have been left impoverished due to the loss of their main caregiver. He claims the $2 million is not a "cash grab."

Howe says there is still a lot of evidence to gather in the lawsuit against the drivers. The drivers' parents are also named in the lawsuit for two reasons: (a) to gain access to their insurance, and (b) because Ontario law says vehicle owners are responsible for the driver's actions.

Punishment and Compensation

Maybe the drivers got off easy with their punishment. Or maybe the house arrest, two years probation, and a lawsuit is punishment enough. In many of these cases, people say that all parties involved are victims. It can be argued that these drivers were just kids, and kids do foolish things, especially when they're behind the wheel. It can also be argued that 20-year-olds are old enough to know they're being dumb, which lead to the death of a man. The parents of the two drivers might be victims. After all, they weren't there when their kids were out street racing, and suddenly they're being targeted in a $2 million lawsuit.

Tahir Khan's family in Pakistan would certainly argue with all of the above. They're the ones who lost a family member thousands of miles away in an accident that probably could have been avoided.

Many aspects of life are radically different in Pakistan than they are in Canada and the US. But this case transcends cultural differences because losing your primary caregiver in any city or country is bound to cause economic hardship, as well as grief, anger, and frustration. $2 million doesn't seem too much to ask for.

If you have suffered injuries or lost a loved one due to another driver's negligence, please contact an experienced injury lawyer to help guide you through the legal process.

Labels: , ,

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

New Study Confirms Avandia Danger

A recent study by the Canadian Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES) has increased concerns about Avandia and drugs in its class that are used to treat type 2 diabetes. The study showed patients treated with glitazones had a 60 percent higher risk of heart failure requiring hospitalization compared to patients given another class of diabetes pill. These patients had a 40 percent higher risk of heart attack, and a 30 percent higher risk of dying compared to those on the other drugs. The study was conducted by analyzing data for 160,000 diabetics aged 65 and older from the Ontario Drug Benefit (ODB) database.

The data represents the most comprehensive figures in the study of Avandia's effects and it raises questions as to why this dangerous drug is still on the market. In human terms, the figures mean that for every 100 patients taking the drugs for the four years covered by the study, there were three additional cases of heart failure, four additional heart attacks, and five premature deaths whose cause might be attributed to the drug. Although Health Canada withdrew approval of the drug for all but patients who could not tolerate other diabetes drugs early in November, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been reluctant to do so, although it did put a black-box warning on the drug.

If the FDA will not protect us from dangerous drugs, who will? If you have been injured by a dangerous pharmaceutical, you cannot undo the damage, but you can make sure your continuing expenses are covered and diminish the profit of those who did you harm. Consult a Phoenix, Arizona-area defective drug lawyer at the firm of Snyder & Wenner, P.C. today to find out what options are open to you.

Labels: , , ,

Click on a link to find a Personal Injury Lawyer in that state.

Disclaimer: The information throughout The Personal Injury Directory is not intended to be or to replace legal advice. The information throughout The Personal Injury Directory is intended to provide general information regarding personal injury law. If you are interested in bringing a personal injury lawsuit, contact a personal injury attorney in your area.